Often, in my research on residential schools, I have come across a before and after image of Thomas Moore, a pupil at Regina Indian Industrial School. Initially I found the image deeply distrubing, while my reaction was not as visceral as Susan Sontag's response to photographs of Holocaust survivors, I was nevertheless disturbed. There are no obvious signs of trauma on the face or body of the child in either photograph, rather a boy in different modes of dress. Nevertheless, they are powerful images that delineate a racist government agenda. An agenda that involvied the destruction of an indigenous culture and the abuse of thousands of children.

These photographs first appeared in the Department of Indian Affairs 1904 Annual Report. The denoted message remains the same over the last century: a juxtaposition of two photos. One with an Aboriginal boy in “authentic” traditional dress and another with the same boy in western clothing. The connotation of the images, however, has changed. What was once seen as a 'desirable outcome' is now understood as an act of violence.
I first saw these photos in Shingwauk’s Vision, J.R. Miller’s comprehensive history of residential schools. In this text the photos are cropped close to Moore’s body and hide revealing details about the intended reading of the photograph. For example, the first image containes a fur lined ledge indicating a “natural” and “authentic” setting, where as a potted plant, that is as cultivated and manicured as Thomas, is present in the after shot. Soon after comming across the images in Miller's work, I began seeing it again and again. I saw them on book covers, posters and even in the travelling exhibit: Where are the Children? The photos of Thomas Moore feature on the promotional material, the exhibit catalogue and the orginal was present in the exibit itself.

I think that Kim Greenwell analyses this image in her article in BC Studies. But I never noticed just how pervasive it is (then and now) until you pointed it out. It is certainly daunting to sort out the multiple circulations of images like these. It is curious that Miller's book crops the image that way - I've had questions before about his use of images, and completely agree that the effect (whether on purpose or not) is to erase the intended readings. - j.
ReplyDelete